Task:
In an existing tool, many experiments were found to be invalid according to the procedure in accordance with the guideline (Chapter 5.3 of Ph. Eur. 7 2011) (signals from the significance tests for deviations from parallelism or from homogeneity of variances). The reasons for this had to be determined.
Methodological solution:
The significance tests were not used adequately in the guideline, it is the case that the null hypothesis should be proven, for which statistical tests are not suitable. This has also been described in the literature [Hauck Walter W., Assessing Parallelism Prior to Determining Relative Potency, PDA J. Pharmaceutical Science Technology 59: 127-137)]. E
Equivalence tests must be formulated. For parallelism, the Fieller confidence interval for the ratio of the increases was used. (In a newer version of the guideline, this procedure is now also planned - in addition to the old procedure.)
The equivalence limits must also be set. Historical data was used for this. This gave rise to the task of programming a new tool. These limits are checked annually.
VBA solution:
Creation of a tool for a series of typical experiments with different designs and different numbers of replicas. Integration of an R tool for calculating the Fieller AI. Detection of any incorrect entries. Validation through parallel programming in SAS and extensive test runs. The results are stored in a separate, printable and storable spreadsheet. These saved results can later be read in again with a separate tool to verify the historical limits.